Compare

Cursor vs Devin Desktop: which AI code editor should you try?

Two AI-first code editors with free plans, MCP support and agents. Here's how to choose.

Verdict

These are close in what they offer, so try both free plans on one real task and keep the one that feels better. Devin Desktop's free plan has unlimited Tab completions and inline edits, but it was renamed recently, so check which docs apply.

Cursor and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) are the same kind of tool: a code editor with AI built in. Because they're so alike, the useful comparison is about the details and how each vendor presents the product.

The short version

CursorDevin Desktop
What it isAI-first editor on a VS Code foundationAI code editor from Cognition
Free planYes, limited agent and chat requestsYes: unlimited Tab completions and inline edits, light agent quota
MCP serversYes, via mcp.jsonYes (stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE)
Project instructions.cursor/rules and AGENTS.mdReads AGENTS.md, imports older .windsurf/rules files
BrandingCursorRecently renamed

Plans change often. See cursor.com/pricing and devin.ai/pricing.

What they have in common

  • AI in the editor. Chat, agent-style editing and autocomplete in both.
  • MCP. Both let you plug in extra tools via the Model Context Protocol.
  • AGENTS.md. Both read it, so one instruction file can serve both editors.
  • Free plans. Both let you try before paying, with limits.

Key differences

The free plan. Cursor's free plan has limited agent and chat requests. Devin Desktop's includes unlimited Tab completions and inline edits, with only a light quota for agents. If you mostly want autocomplete, that may matter. If you want to lean on the agent, expect to hit limits in either and check the pricing pages.

Project rules. Cursor has its own .cursor/rules format. Devin Desktop imports older .windsurf/rules files and reads AGENTS.md. If you plan to use both, AGENTS.md is the portable choice.

Setting up MCP. Cursor uses a simple mcp.json file. Devin Desktop lists support over stdio, Streamable HTTP and SSE. We haven't compared the setup experience in depth.

Product churn. The rename came with a reorganisation, with docs and pricing now on Devin's sites. Older tutorials may not match what you see.

Learning curve. Both are full code editors, which is a lot to take in if you have never used one. Cursor's layout will feel familiar if you've used VS Code, since it's built on a VS Code foundation. We haven't verified how Devin Desktop compares, so try it yourself.

Using them together

You can install both and open the same project. Running two AI editors on one repo can make it unclear which one made a change, so commit often.

Who should pick what

  • You want guides that match the product: Cursor, given the recent rename.
  • You mostly want strong free autocomplete and inline edits: Devin Desktop.
  • You use AGENTS.md and want to stay portable: Either.
  • You can't decide: Spend an hour with each on the same task.

For a different kind of comparison, see Claude Code vs Cursor.

Our verdict

There's no clear winner on the features we could confirm. Let the free plans decide: use both on one real task and keep whichever you reach for.